The Carbon Inequality Era

Join our community of #ClimateChangers and play your part in confronting carbon inequality.

In 1990, we entered a new global era.

From 1990 until 2015, as much carbon entered our atmosphere as had been emitted in all previous years in our history.

Our new report, Confronting Carbon Inequality, shows that responsibility for this rapid emissions rise is shockingly unequal. In this period, the richest 10% emitted the same amount of carbon as the rest of the world combined.

West Africa has been hit hard by the consequences of these inequalities. Today in the Sahel, per capita carbon dioxide emissions are about six times lower than the global average. Yet Sahel temperatures are rising 1.5 times faster than the global average.

And Sahelian countries will see an increase of more than 10% in the number of people falling below the poverty line if nothing is done to combat the climate crisis and inequality over the next ten years.

This is the era of extreme carbon inequality.

Join our community of #ClimateChangers and play your part in confronting carbon inequality.

Who are the richest 10%?

If your net income is over 21,200,000 CFA annually, the chances are you’re one of the richest 10% of people in the world.

That 10% - around 630 million people at the time of the study - live in every continent, and there are wealthy communities in every country. A sizeable proportion of the population in North America and Europe sit comfortably in this demographic. By contrast, in most parts of Africa, Asia, and Latin America, the number of people on the global 10% rich list is tiny.

The emissions of the richest largely come from flying more, buying more polluting cars such as SUVs, and driving them further. These are often known as ‘lifestyle’ emissions.

Additionally, many of the emissions we all produce are ‘embedded’ – this means that they are happening because we live in a world that still relies on fossil fuels. In cooler climates, people need to heat their homes, for example, and gas is still the most accessible option. Many of us can make climate-conscious choices when it comes to the food we eat, the clothes and tech we buy – but all come with some carbon cost in this system.

So as well as individual action, we need radical, far-reaching change to the system if we are to truly confront carbon inequality.

Why now?

Time is short. There is a limit to the total amount of carbon that can be pumped into the atmosphere. Breaching this limit – the so-called ‘carbon budget’ – will trigger runaway global heating, that we can no longer control or remedy. Think of it like filling a bath – there is still some space left before we reach the top, but if we don’t turn off the taps now, it’s going to overflow.

Over the last decades, this remaining ‘space’ in the atmosphere could have been used to lift all of humanity out of poverty, towards a decent standard of living. Adding some carbon emissions by connecting people to the electricity grid while we’re still transitioning to renewables, for example.

Instead, the carbon budget has been spent by the already-rich on luxury emissions. If we continue as we are, we will blow the carbon budget in the next ten years. Carbon inequality is driving us towards climate catastrophe.

So, what do we do now?

Back to the bath analogy - just as every drop of water increases the risk of an overflow, every ton of carbon counts in moving us towards the climate brink.

As every ton counts, there is hope if we all play a role individually and collectively. COVID-19 showed us – painfully, and unjustly, but decisively nonetheless - that huge changes are possible when necessary. Flights were grounded, new bike lanes appeared in cities, and homeworking cut traffic congestion. Governments and businesses showed they can be radical when there is no other choice.

As we turn towards recovery from the pandemic, governments and regional institutions must act now to reduce emissions from the richest and increase support for the poorest. They must adopt new agricultural, economic and energy investment policies that prioritize:

1) family farming and agroecology as models of sustainable production;

2) the widespread use of renewable energies;

3) the strengthening of regulations on mining and fossil fuel exploitation to guarantee the rights of indigenous peoples and reduce impacts on the environment and the ecosystem.

Looking at the big picture, we must profoundly change the way we measure economic success. Let’s learn from the past decades and prioritize care, the sustainability of life, health, and wellbeing, instead of pursuing endless economic growth.

2020 must mark the end of the carbon inequality era. How we shape the next decades - the post-COVID era – is up to us.

Join our community of #ClimateChangers and play your part in confronting carbon inequality.